On the epistemological validity of the mystic experience
Monday, December 12, 2005 → by Danieru"The available scientific evidence tends to support the view that the mystic experience is one of internal perception, an experience that can be ecstatic, profound, or therapeutic for purely internal reasons. Yet for psychological science, the problem of understanding such internal processes is hardly less complex than the theological problem of understanding God. Indeed, regardless of one's direction in the search to know what reality is, a feeling of awe, beauty, reverence, and humility seems to be the product of one's efforts. Since these emotions are characteristic of the mystic experience, itself, the question of the epistemological validity of that experience may have less importance than was initially supposed."From Deautomatization and the Mystic Experience by Arthur J. Deikman
Categories: Science, Reality, Mysticism, Weird, Mind, Quotes, Human, Religion, Consciousness
Heathen Dan said...
Leonard Zusne & Warren H. Jones, Anomalistic Psychology, p 69
December 12, 2005 9:12 AM
Danieru said...
"Paul: I had my first seizure when I was eight years old. I remember seeing a bright light before I fell on the ground and wondering where it came from. Suddenly it was all crystal clear to me, doctor. There was no longer any doubt anymore. [Paul proceeds to outline further details]
Ramachandran: Can you be a little more specific?
Paul: Well, its not easy, doctor. Its like trying to explain the rapture of sex to a child who has not reached puberty. Des that make sense to you?
Ramachandran: What do you think of the rapture of sex?
Paul: Well, to be honest, I'm not interested in it anymore. It doesn't mean much to me. It pales completely beside the divine light that I have seen."
I also blogged a relevant quote by Dosteoevsky a while back (he was also an epileptic). All very fascinating stuff..
December 12, 2005 9:27 AM
Danieru said...
January 03, 2006 6:41 PM
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Comments